Bad business – King fumes at Tottenham as big-name star lined up for shock exit
Bryan King has criticized Tottenham Hotspur for their handling of Son Heung-min’s contract situation, expressing frustration over the delay in securing the player’s future.
King, speaking exclusively to Tottenham News, emphasized that extending Son’s contract by a year is the bare minimum the club should have done, particularly given his immense contributions on and off the pitch. He previously advocated for a new two-year deal for the Spurs captain, arguing that the current approach reflects poor business management.
King pointed out that Tottenham had ample time to address the matter and ensure Son’s future was secured well in advance. He believes the delay undermines the player’s importance to the club, both as a key performer on the field and as a global ambassador.
Son’s popularity in South Korea, for example, has consistently boosted Tottenham’s international profile, with large numbers of South Korean fans attending matches and contributing significantly to the club’s merchandise sales.
King argued that failing to fully capitalize on this opportunity by solidifying Son’s commitment is a glaring oversight.
Recent reports suggest that Tottenham intends to extend Son’s contract until 2026 rather than offering him a completely new deal.
According to TBR Football, this decision has reportedly caused dissatisfaction within Son’s camp, potentially opening the door for interest from other clubs. Galatasaray, among others, has been speculated as a possible suitor for the South Korean star, although any potential transfer would come at a steep cost. A price tag of £50 million has been suggested, reflecting Son’s continued value despite his age.
The reluctance to offer a new long-term deal has raised questions among fans and pundits alike. Extending the contract by just one year might keep Son at the club temporarily but leaves room for continued speculation about his future.
This situation could attract the attention of other clubs, which may unsettle both the player and the team. For manager Ange Postecoglou, such uncertainty presents a challenge as he seeks to build a stable and competitive squad.
Son’s contributions to Tottenham go beyond his goal-scoring prowess and creative play. He has consistently demonstrated leadership qualities, earning the captain’s armband and serving as a role model for younger players.
His work rate, humility, and commitment have endeared him to fans and made him a vital figure in the dressing room. Losing a player of his caliber would not only weaken the squad but also send a negative message about the club’s ambition.
Financially, Son remains a significant asset for Tottenham. His global appeal, particularly in South Korea, translates to substantial revenue through ticket sales, merchandise, and sponsorships.
King highlighted that the number of South Korean fans attending Spurs games underscores Son’s value as a marketing powerhouse. By failing to offer him a new, longer-term deal, Tottenham risks alienating a key segment of their fanbase and missing out on potential financial benefits.
While Son’s potential departure may seem unlikely, the lack of a new contract could encourage interested parties to test Tottenham’s resolve. Clubs like Galatasaray may view the current situation as an opportunity to secure a marquee signing.
For Tottenham, any sale would need to command a significant fee, given Son’s importance to the team. However, even a high transfer fee might not offset the broader implications of losing one of the club’s most iconic players.
From a strategic perspective, Tottenham’s approach to Son’s contract appears short-sighted. Offering a new long-term deal would not only demonstrate the club’s commitment to retaining top talent but also provide stability as Postecoglou continues to shape his squad. It would signal ambition and reassure fans that the club values its key players. Extending the contract by a single year, while practical in the short term, fails to address the underlying concerns about the player’s future.
Ultimately, the handling of Son’s contract situation has sparked unnecessary uncertainty. For a player who has given so much to the club, Tottenham’s approach seems inadequate and risks damaging their relationship with one of their most influential figures.
Addressing the issue promptly and decisively by offering a new long-term deal would reaffirm Son’s place at the heart of the team and send a clear message about Tottenham’s aspirations moving forward.
Read Also: Spurs agree deal to sign striker – announce in the transfer window
Read Also: Postecoglou on Tottenham’s remaining transfer window plans