Fabio Paratici now has a serious reason to be annoyed with Daniel Levy at Tottenham

The corridors of power at Tottenham Hotspur are bracing for another period of upheaval as Daniel Levy prepares to make what could be his most consequential decision in years.

Ange Postecoglou’s tenure hangs by a thread following a disastrous Premier League campaign that saw Spurs plummet to 17th place, their lowest finish in recent memory.

While the Australian tactician salvaged some pride with Europa League success, the stark reality of their domestic form has left the club hierarchy with little choice but to consider cutting ties just two seasons into his project.

This impending managerial crisis represents more than just another reboot – it highlights a fundamental failure in Tottenham’s decision-making process dating back to 2023.

Rewind to that fateful summer, and Spurs found themselves at a similar crossroads with multiple high-profile candidates under consideration. Fabio Paratici, the club’s former managing director of football, had identified Luis Enrique as his preferred choice, while Arne Slot and Vincent Kompany also featured prominently in the conversation.

Yet Levy opted for Postecoglou, a decision that now appears increasingly misguided when contrasted with Enrique’s subsequent achievements at Paris Saint-Germain.

The comparative trajectories of these two managers since that summer make for painful reading for Tottenham supporters. While Postecoglou struggled to impose his philosophy in England’s top flight, Enrique has cemented his reputation as one of Europe’s elite coaches.

The Spaniard’s PSG side just completed a historic Champions League and Ligue 1 double, showcasing the tactical sophistication and big-game mentality that Tottenham so desperately crave.

The statistics paint an even starker picture – Enrique’s 70% win rate at PSG dwarfs Postecoglou’s 46% at Spurs, while the Australian suffered nearly three times as many defeats (40) as his counterpart (14) over a similar period.

These numbers become even more damning when considering the resources at each manager’s disposal. While PSG’s financial might gives them an inherent advantage in France, Tottenham’s squad should never have found itself just one place above the relegation zone.

Enrique’s ability to maximize talent and implement a clear identity stands in stark contrast to Postecoglou’s struggles to establish consistency, despite having comparable attacking weapons at his disposal.

The timing of this reckoning couldn’t be more poignant, with Paratici reportedly set to return to the club in an advisory capacity. The Italian executive must be privately seething at seeing his preferred candidate lift European football’s ultimate prize while Tottenham face yet another rebuild.

While no one can definitively claim Enrique would have replicated his PSG success in North London, it’s difficult to imagine a coach of his pedigree presiding over such a dismal league campaign.

This impending managerial change represents more than just another appointment – it’s a test of Tottenham’s ambition and decision-making framework.

The club cannot afford another misstep in their search for Postecoglou’s successor, not with Champions League football returning to the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium next season.

Levy faces intense scrutiny to demonstrate he’s learned from past mistakes, particularly with Paratici back in the fold advocating for a more strategic approach to recruitment.

As Tottenham prepare to enter another transitional phase, the ghosts of decisions past loom large. The what-ifs surrounding Enrique’s near-appointment will continue to haunt the club unless they can finally identify and secure a manager capable of delivering both results and a coherent footballing identity.

With the summer transfer window approaching and a squad in need of rejuvenation, Tottenham’s next move could define their trajectory for years to come – they simply cannot afford to get it wrong again.