Ange Postecoglou’s answer about Daniel Levy speaks volumes about relationship

The world of football management is often a story of brief, intense relationships between coaches and chairmen, partnerships built on shared ambition that can sometimes end as quickly as they begin.

The recent departure of Daniel Levy from Tottenham Hotspur after nearly 25 years has sparked reflection across the game, and one voice offering a particularly interesting perspective is that of Ange Postecoglou.

Now unveiled as the new head coach of 8Nottingham Forest, the Australian was inevitably asked to comment on the exit of the man who appointed him at Spurs just two years prior.

His response was a masterclass in diplomacy, offering respect without deep sentiment, and revealing a relationship that was always more professional than personal.

When questioned about Levy’s departure, Postecoglou was careful and measured. “I don’t think it’s the kind of forum for me to speak about that at length,” he began, immediately setting a boundary.

He went on to explain that their interactions were limited, noting, “I tend to get on with my daily business and do what I need to do.”

This straightforward admission speaks volumes. It paints a picture of a manager who was given autonomy over the football side of the operation, with the chairman operating at a strategic, boardroom level.

There was no suggestion of a close friendship, but rather a working relationship built on a clear division of responsibilities.

Despite this professional distance, Postecoglou was quick to acknowledge Levy’s monumental impact on the club, stating he “invested a hell of a lot in the football club in terms of building it up to where it was.”

Most importantly, he expressed gratitude for the opportunity he was given and highlighted the tangible success he delivered in return: “Obviously, he appointed me so I’ve got to be thankful for that.

Hopefully I repaid him with winning a trophy which they haven’t had in a long time.” That trophy, the Europa League, was a historic moment for the club, ending a 17-year wait for silverware and providing a glorious high note in Levy’s tenure, even if it came at a significant cost to their league position.

The conversation then turned to his own exit from North London, which Postecoglou described with a sense of calm acceptance. “It wasn’t great, I knew it was coming so it wasn’t a surprise,” he revealed, explaining that he had sensed the end was near even before the Europa League final.

This foresight allowed him to fully enjoy the trophy celebration and the subsequent parade with the fans, precious moments he did not allow the looming decision to “tarnish.”

Rather than dwelling on any sense of injustice, his focus remains on the positive aspects of his time at the club—the “fantastic people” he worked with and the overwhelming affection he still receives from the supporters.

“There isn’t a Spurs supporter that I come across now that doesn’t want to hug me and take me home for dinner,” he noted with a smile.

“So I must have done something right.” This connection with the fans, and the pride in delivering a long-awaited trophy, is what he chooses to carry with him.

In the end, Postecoglou’s reflections offer a mature perspective on the transient nature of football management.

He understands that endings, even abrupt ones, are part of the industry. His departure from Tottenham and Levy’s exit are simply chapters closing, making way for new beginnings for both men.

There is no bitterness, only a philosophical acknowledgment that sometimes things simply run their course, and that’s okay.