Postecoglou stubbornness is clearly holding Tottenham back from their true identity

Ange Postecoglou’s rigid approach is limiting Tottenham’s potential, as seen in their recent match against Crystal Palace. Selhurst Park buzzed with energy as Crystal Palace, under Oliver Glasner, pulled off a stunning 1-0 win that broke their winless streak.

Glasner, passionately motivating fans in the final minutes of extra time, saw his efforts pay off with a powerful display that brought the crowd to life.

For Tottenham, it was a day to forget. Palace, previously in the relegation zone, dominated the game with a tenacity and organization that Tottenham failed to match.

Mateta scored the only goal, yet Palace’s performance highlighted their resurgence under Glasner. Each player on the Palace squad displayed a commitment to outwork and outplay their Tottenham counterparts, leading to an inevitable victory over a Spurs side that has recently seemed to lose direction.

The post-match scene was telling. Guglielmo Vicario approached the traveling Tottenham fans with a look of remorse, gesturing in apology, while James Maddison stayed longer, looking dejected and pondering his second consecutive early substitution.

This self-reflection captures Tottenham’s need to assess their tactics and strategies, especially since Mateta’s goal showcased Palace’s brilliant pressing strategy that exposed Tottenham’s struggle to play through it.

In one telling moment, Micky van de Ven hesitated, allowing Daniel Munoz to capitalize, intercepting the ball and setting up Mateta’s winning goal. The recurring attempts to play out from the back under intense pressure backfired, as Vicario, determined not to play long, almost gifted another opportunity to Munoz.

This adherence to Ange Postecoglou’s “Angeball” style — which emphasizes playing through pressure — proved risky. The philosophy emphasizes non-negotiable tactics, but inflexibility seems to be a drawback.

Just before halftime, when Maddison relieved pressure with a long volley, Postecoglou immediately reprimanded him, a sign of the manager’s commitment to his principles.

However, when Maddison’s decision helped Spurs create their best chance shortly after halftime, the potential benefit of adapting the game plan became clear.

Two minutes after halftime, Vicario launched the ball toward Dominic Solanke, who deftly controlled it, setting up a chance for Dejan Kulusevski.

This uncharacteristic long pass nearly led to a goal, yet Tottenham quickly reverted to playing short, passing within their own box. Meanwhile, Palace continued to press, and Eberechi Eze, central to their attacks, repeatedly threatened Spurs’ defense.

Eze’s skill almost paid off when he scored — only to be caught offside by a hair. Later, he narrowly missed and had a penalty appeal denied, underlining his influence during Palace’s dominant 15-minute period in the second half.

Postecoglou’s response was to make a triple substitution, notably withdrawing Maddison and Kulusevski, two of his most creative players.

While bold substitutions had worked in the previous match, this time, shifting from a 4-3-3 to a 4-2-4 proved ineffective. Solanke and Richarlison couldn’t link up, and Timo Werner offered little impact.

Even with 17-year-old Mikey Moore becoming Tottenham’s youngest Premier League starter in decades, the team lacked urgency as the game wore on.

Tottenham’s attempts to equalize became increasingly desperate, as they resorted to hopeful crosses into Palace’s box. Palace’s defense, led by Maxence Lacroix and Marc Guehi, comfortably dealt with these efforts. This resilience left Tottenham struggling for answers on the pitch, as Palace secured their first victory with relative ease.

The outcome has sparked questions about Tottenham’s next steps. Fans are frustrated by away performances that seem to lack the fluidity and focus that the team had shown earlier in the season.

For Postecoglou, the challenge remains: to balance his attacking philosophy with the flexibility needed to succeed against well-organized opponents like Palace. This latest setback underscores the need for a more adaptable approach if Tottenham hope to unlock their true potential in the Premier League.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply