King drops big verdict on Sir Jim Ratcliffe amid ‘advanced’ Tottenham investment talks
Bryan King has raised doubts about whether any investment in Tottenham Hotspur would mirror Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s approach at Manchester United.
The former Spurs scout expressed skepticism about the level of control potential investors might receive if they were to invest in the North London club.
King, speaking exclusively to Tottenham News, suggested that Tottenham’s current leadership, particularly chairman Daniel Levy, would likely maintain a strong grip on the club’s operations, even in the event of external investment.
King questioned the financial scope and control that potential investors would have, drawing a comparison to Ratcliffe’s ongoing influence at Manchester United.
Ratcliffe’s investment has allowed him to reshape many aspects of the club’s structure, but King doubts that a similar scenario would play out at Tottenham.
He explained that while Ratcliffe has been able to significantly impact Manchester United’s decisions and strategy, it is difficult to envision Levy allowing that degree of freedom at Tottenham.
King’s comments reflect the belief that Tottenham’s leadership is unlikely to permit external investors to exert significant influence over the club’s operations.
Levy, known for his careful and measured approach, would likely continue to play a central role in decision-making, regardless of any potential financial backing.
King emphasized that the nature of any deal would only become clear once the financial details and conditions of the investment are revealed.
He also referenced Amanda Staveley, who has made headlines for her role as a minority investor in Newcastle United.
King noted that, as long as Staveley remains a minority shareholder, her influence over the club has remained limited, despite the significant financial backing she helped secure for Newcastle.
Drawing parallels to Tottenham, King suggested that any minority investor in Spurs would likely experience a similar limitation in influence.
Levy’s management style has shaped Tottenham’s operations for years, and there’s little indication that external investment would change that dynamic.
Unlike Ratcliffe’s bold approach at Old Trafford, any potential investors in Tottenham would likely have a more passive role, restricted by the existing leadership structure.
As long as Levy remains at the helm, it is difficult to see any major upheavals or restructuring within the club, even if new financial backing is introduced.
King’s perspective casts doubt on the likelihood of any significant changes at Tottenham under potential new investors. While Ratcliffe has managed to make waves at Manchester United, Tottenham’s situation appears different.
With Levy in charge, external investors would probably face constraints, limiting their ability to make sweeping changes.
Ultimately, until the specifics of any deal are disclosed, it remains uncertain how much influence new investors could have, but Tottenham’s current structure suggests continuity rather than radical transformation.
Read Also: Amanda Staveley just put out official paperwork as £500M Tottenham takeover plot evolves
Read Also: Timo Werner could be granted his Tottenham wish by Postecoglou